On both, you get access to a plethora of tools to adjust and refine your creativity. It’s very hard to find competition for Krita and GIMP when it comes to retouching and editing images. And lastly, the shape tool helps in selecting a particular selected shape. Whereas, the similar color tool helps in picking up all the images that have the same color tone. The contiguous tool help in selecting all the contiguous colors in a particular region. It also has plenty of colors, bezier, and magnetic selection tools. In shape selection, you can choose between rectangle, ellipse, polygon, and contiguous. GIMP has several selection tools as well. And the select by color tool helps in selecting everything that has been colored the same color. The fuzzy select lets you select a similar region. In shape selection, you can go with an oval or rectangle. The list is very long when it comes to the ability of selection tools on both GIMP and Krita.įrom free selection, freehand selection, to shape selection, you get a whole lot of selection tools in Krita. If you are more into non-destructive editing, you will get features like group layers, setting blending modes, opacity, and much more to help you out in your creativity. Layer-wise, both these Adobe Photoshop alternatives make use of layers. The unavailability of CMYK can be a major deal if you are more into print work. In comparison to GIMP, which only has RGB color mode. To be precise, in Krita you get the option of using both RBG and CMYK color modes. Wassalamualaikum.When it comes to color modes, Krita has an upper hand over GIMP. I hope this article can be helpful to others. Even better if youĬan record those tests and publish them also as YouTube video. Please leaveĪ comment below if you manage to test them out. Software also using the same setups I use in this video. I really like to see Krita brush performance compared against those Okay guys, if you use any other graphic software. So, kudos to all of Krita developers for this great achievement. From a user standpoint, regardless of what is going on under the hood, Krita is more performant than Photoshop. Help us to do the tedious calculation so we can focus on the fun stuff, which is making art. We really don’t care what is actually going on in the background because that is exactly what computer supposed do for us. And that is the only thing that matters for us as an artist. All that you feel when drawing in Krita is just buttery smooth performance. All the heavy calculation is done for you automatically in the background. But if you see this from the user perspective that has the “ instant preview” mode always turned on. So, is this means that Krita is not more performant compared to Photoshop or to any other graphic software out there? Well, technically if you look under the hood, yes. Then draw the brush feedback on that smaller canvas size almost instantly, while calculates the real brush stroke in the background progressively. Right? Now, what the smart developer team at Krita did, is that they managed to make Krita to take a smaller version of the canvas. The larger the data the longer it took to process it. you name it, they all face the same problem. Photoshop, Gimp, Corel Painter, Paint tool SAI, Clip Studio Paint, etc. Essentially all graphic software performance suffered from large image and large brush size due to the amount of data they need to process. Previously known as “ LOD strokes” or “Level Of Detail strokes”. This feature is called “ Instant Preview”. Krita uses a brush speed-up mechanism that was funded back in 2015 through a Kickstarter campaign. First, let me explain about the brush previewing technique in Krita. It just “ feel” more performant because it uses different brush previewing technique compared to Photoshop. Now, some of you who are technical geeks may argue that Krita is not more performant. Krita is now officially more performant than Photoshop. But since several releases, especially since version 4.2.1 Krita just open a whole new era that turned the condition upside down. This is the main reason why many people avoid using Krita. And this is just amazing! Because Krita in the old versions of it, is known to be slow and laggy, especially when dealing with large size document and with large size brushes. Currently at version 4.2.1 Krita is actually more responsive than Photoshop. As you can see in this side-by-side comparison.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |